Meursault-Senpai is perfect

The main character in the stranger is a poorly written, author insert character meant to be a mouth piece for Camus to preach his world view.

With cards thrown on the table so hard they are embetted into it, I think it’s a good idea to explain myself. In the novel Meursault is the main character and fits the mold of Camus’s philosophy perfectly, acting as a foil to those who do not. Let’s start at the beginning, in the very first few pages of the book Meursault’s mother dies and he is taken to her funeral. Here he shows very little if any remorse and sadness, a fact that the nursing home director brings up during his homicide trial. Here Camus takes a shot at one of his most hated “social constructs” preventing us from being a “radical subject” and making us “act in bad faith”, family. Meursault is the only one to be above this concept of family and is punished by others for it. the directer is not the only character to be used as a puppet for Camus to sh#t on from on top his high horse. Marie represents the construct of love, the magistrate and the concept of faith, the prosecutor the concept of justice, hell even Meursault’s boss offering him a job in Paris is a shot at power and success. This makes the characters no longer characters, their dolls, puppets, straw man, pieces of notebook paper with faces drawn on them, a real character has a purpose that is driven by themselves, by not including this Camus makes this 100% on his philosophy. Unfourtunatly his philosophy has an extremely smug and self satisfide air to those who are “radical subjects” and as such renders the progatinist to a saintifide status. Below is a simple over view of the book and in my humble opinion equally as valid and good as the original.

Image result for meursault the stranger

2 thoughts on “Meursault-Senpai is perfect

  1. Jordan SD

    Meursault does feel like a puppet throughout the story. His responses to questions seem too bland and show no actual care for what the other person has to say. Not only that but why he does the things he does is questionable when it comes down to what he was trying to accomplish. He shows zero emotion and talks in a random and vague way that doesn’t benefit anyone the satisfaction of receiving some sort of care for what they have to say.


  2. Katie V.

    This really cracked me up when I read it. I agree that at times Camus was a bit heavy-handed. Though, I kind of feel like The Stranger pulled off having such a blatant agenda pretty well.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s